Michael F Schundler
2 min readAug 19, 2022

--

You are correct. As someone who believes in science and Christianity, I can separate science from theology.

I have not bought into the re-invention of language. Everywhere you turn progressive liberals have tried to redefine language like something out George Orwell's 1984, where he wrote if you change language, you will change how people think.

Science says, there are for the most part two sexes (a few people have both sets of sex organs) and they are defined primary by the reproductive systems they are born with.

Here is the key message for you to understand. Sex exists to create genetic diversity in our species, it has no purpose beyond that, and it defines nothing more than one's reproductive system and genetic XY chromosome mix. It does not define how one thinks, behaves, or perceives oneself. There is no other purpose for sex other than creating genetic diveristy through the process of procreation.

If you want to twist your brain and try to construct a "gender" classification to identify common human behaviors shared by a subset of humans, have at it. But at the end of the day, you will fail. As soon as you create your 35, 50, 100, 1000 classifications of gender someone will say you are stereotyping them and call you a bigot.

Now moving on to theology. Theology is not science. It is a belief system. And most religions believe homosexuality is a sin or the equivalent.

Jesus never said, "Sin was not Sin". Not once. Find me a single example. What he did was love sinners. And I love sinners (I better since I am one too and so are you).

I don't believe judging sinners, that is God's job. My job is love sinners, the way I as a sinner would be loved. But loving sinners, does not translate into teaching sin is not sin. It is strange that someone that does backflips to try to understand so many different genders cannot understand the difference between sin and sinners. Jesus teaches us not to "love" sin, but to love the sinner.

My views accord with both science and theology. You are more wrapped up in "social science" rather than physical science. "Social science" is constantly trying to construct a society structure that defines human behaviors and labels them. Have at your gender labels... but there are still only two different sets of reproductive organs... and which set you possess defines your sex. Hence the word "sex", not gender.

--

--

Responses (1)